Open AccessAccuracy of women's recall of opportunistic recruitment for cervical cancer screening in general practice
Author(s) -
Ward Jeanette,
Sanson–Fisher Rob
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.946
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1753-6405
pISSN - 1326-0200
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01709.x
Subject(s) - medicine , recall , cervical screening , gold standard (test) , confidence interval , general practice , cervical cancer , family medicine , gynecology , psychology , cancer , cognitive psychology
Evaluation of strategies to improve opportunistic recruitment via general practice of women overdue for a cervical smear requires an accurate behavioural measure. As part of an experimental trial to evaluate the effect of a postgraduate workshop on preventive care, we conducted this methodological study to determine the accuracy of women's recall of an opportunistic discussion about cervical screening, by comparing it against audiotapes ( n = 524). Taking the taped evidence of the trainee's verbal behaviour as the gold standard, sensitivity was 85 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (CI) 73.1 to 92.0 per cent) and specificity was 78 per cent (CI 73.9 to 81.6 per cent). Given the low rate of opportunistic recruitment by trainees in the main study, only one–third of positive recollections by women of an opportunistic discussion about cervical screening were correct. Until other measures have been validated, women's recall may continue to be used to measure general practitioners' behaviour, but an appreciation of likely bias is recommended.