Open AccessCan occupational therapy intervention play a part in maintaining independence and quality of life in older people? A randomised controlled trial
Author(s) -
Liddle Jeannine,
March Lyn,
Carfrae Barbara,
Finnegan Terence,
Druce Jane,
Schwarz Jennifer,
Brooks Peter
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.946
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1753-6405
pISSN - 1326-0200
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1996.tb01068.x
Subject(s) - medicine , quality of life (healthcare) , residence , intervention (counseling) , occupational therapy , physical therapy , population , gerontology , randomized controlled trial , activities of daily living , nursing , demography , environmental health , surgery , sociology
The main objective of this study was to see if older people could maintain their quality of life and independence after their homes had been modified and they were using community services as recommended by an occupational therapist. There were 167 study participants aged 69 to 94 years from the Northern Sydney Area. After being assessed at home by an occupational therapist, 105 were randomly allocated to one of two groups, to either have or not have the occupational therapist's recommendations carried out. They were assessed again after six months. A third group did not require any intervention. This group was followed up by telephone and postal questionnaire at six months. The main outcome measures used were the Sickness Impact Profile, the Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale, the Life Satisfaction Index, assessment of Activities of Daily Living, the Health Assessment Questionnaire and change in residence. After six months there were no difference in outcomes among the three groups. Most study participants remained at a satisfactory level on each measure. Three people had died. One had moved to hostel care and one had moved to a nursing home. A further 14 from the group having no intervention had withdrawn from the study. A secondary objective of this study was to indicate the responsiveness of these outcome measures to change in the short term (over six months) in an elderly population. Twelve‐month assessments are in progress and may indicate what to expect from these outcome measures in the medium term.