z-logo
Premium
IS THE ASSUMPTION OF UNIFORM INTRA‐CLASS CORRELATION EVER NEEDED?
Author(s) -
Brewer K.R.W.,
Tam S.M.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
australian journal of statistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.434
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-842X
pISSN - 0004-9581
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1990.tb01035.x
Subject(s) - mathematics , correlation , zero (linguistics) , constant (computer programming) , sign (mathematics) , class (philosophy) , population , matrix (chemical analysis) , statistics , covariance matrix , regression analysis , regression , mathematical analysis , computer science , geometry , artificial intelligence , composite material , programming language , philosophy , linguistics , materials science , demography , sociology
Summary When modelling a finite population it is sometimes assumed that the residuals from the regression model expectations are distributed with a uniform non‐zero intra‐class correlation. It is shown that if a certain vector is spanned by the columns of the design matrix (in the homoskedastic case this vector corresponds to the inclusion of a constant term) then such a model is underidentified and the assumption of a known non‐zero correlation has almost no impact on the results of the regression analysis. When this vector is not spanned by the columns of the design matrix, a simpler alternative model can usually be fitted equally well to observations from any single population. The only exception occurs when the the intra‐class correlation required is negative in sign.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here