Premium
Differential item functioning of the Rosenberg Self‐Esteem Scale in the US and China: Measurement bias matters
Author(s) -
Song Hairong,
Cai Huajian,
Brown Jonathon D.,
Grimm Kevin J.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
asian journal of social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.5
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1467-839X
pISSN - 1367-2223
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-839x.2011.01347.x
Subject(s) - differential item functioning , psychology , equivalence (formal languages) , scale (ratio) , self esteem , china , social psychology , item response theory , differential (mechanical device) , clinical psychology , psychometrics , mathematics , physics , discrete mathematics , quantum mechanics , political science , law , engineering , aerospace engineering
Using an item‐response theory‐based approach (i.e. likelihood ratio test with an iterative procedure), we examined the equivalence of the Rosenberg Self‐Esteem Scale (RSES) in a sample of US and Chinese college students. Results from the differential item functioning (DIF) analysis showed that the RSES was not fully equivalent at the item level, as well as at the scale level. The two cultural groups did not use the scale comparably, with the US students showing more extreme responses than the Chinese students. Moreover, we evaluated the practical impact of DIF and found that cultural differences in average self‐esteem scores disappeared after the DIF was taken into account. In the present study, we discuss the implications of our findings for cross‐cultural research and provide suggestions for future studies using the RSES in China.