Premium
Systematic review on the financial return of worksite health promotion programmes aimed at improving nutrition and/or increasing physical activity
Author(s) -
van Dongen J. M.,
Proper K. I.,
van Wier M. F.,
van der Beek A. J.,
Bongers P. M.,
van Mechelen W.,
van Tulder M. W.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
obesity reviews
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.845
H-Index - 162
eISSN - 1467-789X
pISSN - 1467-7881
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00925.x
Subject(s) - physical activity , health promotion , promotion (chess) , business , environmental health , cardiovascular health , medicine , gerontology , finance , physical therapy , nursing , political science , public health , disease , pathology , politics , law
Summary This systematic review summarizes the current evidence on the financial return of worksite health promotion programmes aimed at improving nutrition and/or increasing physical activity. Data on study characteristics and results were extracted from 18 studies published up to 14 January 2011. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Three metrics were (re‐)calculated per study: the net benefits, benefit cost ratio (BCR) and return on investment (ROI). Metrics were averaged, and a post hoc subgroup analysis was performed to compare financial return estimates between study designs. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 13 non‐randomized studies (NRSs) and one modelling study were included. Average financial return estimates in terms of absenteeism benefits (NRS: ROI 325%, BCR 4.25; RCT: ROI −49%, BCR 0.51), medical benefits (NRS: ROI 95%, BCR 1.95; RCT: ROI −112%, BCR −0.12) or both (NRS: ROI 387%, BCR 4.87; RCT: ROI −92%, BCR 0.08) were positive in NRSs, but negative in RCTs. Worksite health promotion programmes aimed at improving nutrition and/or increasing physical activity generate financial savings in terms of reduced absenteeism costs, medical costs or both according to NRSs, whereas they do not according to RCTs. Since these programmes are associated with additional types of benefits, conclusions about their overall profitability cannot be made.