z-logo
Premium
The powers of noise‐fitting: reply to Barth and Paladino
Author(s) -
Opfer John E.,
Siegler Robert S.,
Young Christopher J.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
developmental science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.801
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1467-7687
pISSN - 1363-755X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01070.x
Subject(s) - logarithm , exponent , power function , function (biology) , noise (video) , curve fitting , representation (politics) , power (physics) , mathematics , statistics , statistical physics , mathematical analysis , computer science , physics , artificial intelligence , quantum mechanics , evolutionary biology , politics , political science , law , image (mathematics) , biology , philosophy , linguistics
Barth and Paladino (2011) argue that changes in numerical representations are better modeled by a power function whose exponent gradually rises to 1 than as a shift from a logarithmic to a linear representation of numerical magnitude. However, the fit of the power function to number line estimation data may simply stem from fitting noise generated by averaging over changing proportions of logarithmic and linear estimation patterns. To evaluate this possibility, we used conventional model fitting techniques with individual as well as group average data; simulations that varied the proportion of data generated by different functions; comparisons of alternative models’ prediction of new data; and microgenetic analyses of rates of change in experiments on children’s learning. Both new data and individual participants’ data were predicted less accurately by power functions than by logarithmic and linear functions. In microgenetic studies, changes in the best fitting power function’s exponent occurred abruptly, a finding inconsistent with Barth and Paladino’s interpretation that development of numerical representations reflects a gradual shift in the shape of the power function. Overall, the data support the view that change in this area entails transitions from logarithmic to linear representations of numerical magnitude.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here