Premium
Masculinity and Femininity: A Bipolar Construct and Independent Constructs
Author(s) -
Marsh Herbert W.,
Antill John K.,
Cunningham John D.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
journal of personality
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.082
H-Index - 144
eISSN - 1467-6494
pISSN - 0022-3506
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00566.x
Subject(s) - androgyny , psychology , femininity , masculinity , construct (python library) , confirmatory factor analysis , personality , social psychology , construct validity , test (biology) , psychometrics , social desirability , developmental psychology , structural equation modeling , statistics , psychoanalysis , mathematics , paleontology , computer science , biology , programming language
The present investigation is a reanalysis of data from Antill and Cunningham (1979, 1980, Marsh, Antill, & Cunningham, 1987) consisting of responses to five masculinity‐femininity (MF) instruments, two self‐esteem instruments, and two social desirability scales Correlations between M and F for the five instruments varied from 23 to approximately ‐ 10, support for distinguishable (nonbipolar) M and F factors was found for four of the instruments Applying confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and hierarchical CFA (HCFA), the present study examined the dimensionality of MF and the influence of method/ halo effects m response to specific instruments The best fitting model identified three higher order factors, in support of traditional personality theories one factor was a bipolar MF construct, but m support of androgyny theory the other two factors were distinguishable M and F factors The factor structures were reasonably invanant for men and women, and methodological implications of this important finding were examined In subsequent analyses, the higher order MF factors were related to self‐esteem, social desirability, and gender in order to further test interpretations of the MF factors.