Premium
The Antecedents of Middle Managers’ Strategic Contribution: The Case of a Professional Bureaucracy
Author(s) -
Currie Graeme,
Procter Stephen J.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of management studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.398
H-Index - 184
eISSN - 1467-6486
pISSN - 0022-2380
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00546.x
Subject(s) - bureaucracy , ambiguity , middle management , context (archaeology) , role conflict , public relations , socialization , sociology , limiting , political science , management , social psychology , psychology , law , economics , paleontology , philosophy , linguistics , politics , biology , mechanical engineering , engineering
Our study contributes towards a burgeoning literature that argues organizational performance is heavily influenced by what happens in the middle of the organization, rather than at the top. Examining the UK National Health Service, our study develops the work of Floyd and Wooldridge (1992, 1994, 1997, 2000). It utilizes role theory to conceptualize changing experiences of middle managers in organizations as a role transition. Associated with this are problems of role conflict and role ambiguity (Biddle, 1979, 1986; Biddle and Thomas, 1966; Kahn et al., 1964, 1966). Our study illustrates that there are limiting factors to a more strategic role for middle managers associated with the professional bureaucracy context. However, role conflict and ambiguity can be mediated by a socialization process, which values incoming identity and personal characteristics (Van Maanen and Schein, 1979).