Premium
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE PHILOSOPHER‐KING? THE LEADER'S ADDICTION TO POWER
Author(s) -
Vries Manfred F. R. Kets
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
journal of management studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.398
H-Index - 184
eISSN - 1467-6486
pISSN - 0022-2380
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1991.tb00285.x
Subject(s) - unconscious mind , mirroring , power (physics) , meaning (existential) , nothing , context (archaeology) , psychology , anxiety , social psychology , death anxiety , psychoanalysis , sociology , epistemology , philosophy , psychotherapist , history , physics , archaeology , psychiatry , quantum mechanics
This articles postulates the existence of a number of conscious and unconscious forces which make leaders reluctant to relinquish power. It is suggested that a major reason for the unwillingness to let go is the transferential effects of leadership. Both mirroring and idealizing transference reactions are discussed. In addition, there is the ageing factor which may contribute to the addictiveness of power, since ageing can evoke a strong need for compensatory strivings. the talionic principle ‐ meaning in this case the conscious or unconscious fear that the loss of power will be followed by some form of retaliation for previous acts ‐ may be another factor contributing to power's addictiveness. In this context the role of envy is emphasized. Finally, the existence of a ‘fear of nothingness’ is postulated, that is, a form of anxiety which leads to a need to defeat death by leaving some kind of legacy. It is suggested that holding onto power is linked to the fear that this legacy may be destroyed.