Premium
Marginalized Mothers, Reproductive Autonomy, and ‘Repeat Losses To Care’
Author(s) -
Cox Pamela
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of law and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.263
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1467-6478
pISSN - 0263-323X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00599.x
Subject(s) - autonomy , institutionalisation , citizenship , sterilization (economics) , reproductive rights , state (computer science) , family planning , political science , reproductive health , sociology , population , law , economics , research methodology , demography , politics , currency , algorithm , monetary economics , computer science , foreign exchange market
Over 70,000 children are ‘looked after’ by local authorities in England and Wales. Emerging research suggests that a significant proportion of their birth parents have either already lost a child to permanent adoption or will go on to lose others. These ‘repeat loss’ cases raise difficult questions about marginalized mothers and their reproductive autonomy. This article considers past and present tactics used by the state in its attempts to limit that autonomy, including institutionalization, sterilization, long‐acting contraception, and permanent adoption. It argues that the gradual democratization of intimate citizenship over the past century, defined as a person's ability to choose and direct their intimate relationships, has obliged the contemporary state to develop new tactics which aim to build personal capacity and to balance enhanced child protection with enhanced reproductive autonomy.