Premium
Legal Disciplinary Practices – Who Needs Them?
Author(s) -
McVea Harry
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of law and society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.263
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1467-6478
pISSN - 0263-323X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2004.00303.x
Subject(s) - disenchantment , legal service , discipline , legal profession , elite , government (linguistics) , public interest , legal research , political science , public relations , business , public administration , law , politics , philosophy , linguistics
The recent publication of the government's Review of the Regulatory Framework for Legal Services in England and Walesin March 2004 heralds a new era regarding the way in which legal services are to be delivered to the public. In the wake of the Enron‐Arthur Andersen debacle, and growing disenchantment amongst policy‐makers and market players with the involvement of ‘elite’ accountancy firms in the provision of legal services, interest and attention has now shifted away from the formation of Multi‐Disciplinary Practices towards a new model of legal services provider– Legal Disciplinary Practices (LDPs), where the focus is at all times on the provision of legal services, albeit widely defined. The purpose of this article is to explore, and subsequently critique, the rationales behind the formation of LDPs and to outline the dangers which the provision of legal services through such business structures is likely to pose not only for the legal profession, but also for society more generally.