Premium
The Multijurisdictional Disclosure System and Value of Equity Offerings
Author(s) -
Mittoo Usha R.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of international financial management and accounting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.818
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1467-646X
pISSN - 0954-1314
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-646x.2006.121.x
Subject(s) - equity (law) , issuer , stock price , business , stock (firearms) , stock exchange , market segmentation , monetary economics , economics , finance , marketing , mechanical engineering , paleontology , series (stratigraphy) , political science , law , biology , engineering
The Canada and US multijurisdictional disclosure system (MJDS) implemented in 1991 lowered the indirect barriers for investors and issuers by easing reporting and disclosure requirements for cross‐border issues. This paper examines the impact of the MJDS and related regulatory changes on Canada–US equity market segmentation using a sample of Canadian seasoned equity offerings in the 1991–1998 period. We find that the number of cross‐border issues by Canadian firms increased, and the typical negative stock price reaction that accompanies seasoned equity issues declined over time, supporting increased integration between the two markets after the MJDS. We also document that cross‐border issues experience about 1.4 per cent lower negative stock price reaction compared with domestic issues, consistent with Canada–US market segmentation. We find mixed support for Merton's (1987) investor recognition hypothesis. While Canadian firms cross‐listed in the US experience a less adverse price reaction to their cross‐border offerings compared with their non‐US‐listed peers, there is no significant difference between the two groups in the case of purely domestic issues.