Premium
The Economic Determinants of the Home Country Bias in Investors' Portfolios: A Survey
Author(s) -
Uppal Raman
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
journal of international financial management and accounting
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.818
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1467-646X
pISSN - 0954-1314
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-646x.1992.tb00028.x
Subject(s) - portfolio , economics , equity (law) , stock (firearms) , financial economics , hedge , monetary economics , mechanical engineering , ecology , political science , law , biology , engineering
Abstract In this article, we survey the international portfolio choice literature to investigate why investors choose to bias their portfolios towards domestic equity, even though there are significant gains to diversifying internationally. We focus on three potential explanations. First, we consider if the high proportion of domestic assets in investors' portfolios can be explained by their desire to hedge home inflation. While the models of Krugman (1981), Sercu (1980), Adler and Dumas (1983), and Stulz (1981a, 1983) suggest that this is the case, the model in Uppal (1993) shows that this is true only when relative risk aversion is less than one. Second, we consider the prevailing institutional barriers to foreign investment to see if they are sufficiently large to explain the bias observed in investors' portfolios. Halliday (1989) reports that there are few constraints on investing in foreign stock markets. This is especially true when investing in the markets of developed countries. Even when restrictions exist, they are usually not binding. Third, we consider the models of Black (1974) and Stulz (1981b) to see if transactions costs for investing abroad and taxes on income from foreign assets can explain the home equity bias. Cooper and Kaplanis (1986, 1991) and French and Porterba (1991) estimate that the taxes required to explain the observed bias are much larger than those investors actually face. We conclude that it is unlikely that these three factors are significant enough to explain the degree of the bias in portfolios that is observed empirically.