z-logo
Premium
Response to commentary: is collaboration a viable target for family therapists?
Author(s) -
Sutherland Olga,
Strong Tom
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of family therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.52
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1467-6427
pISSN - 0163-4445
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2012.00585.x
Subject(s) - limiting , family therapy , psychotherapist , essentialism , psychology , power (physics) , epistemology , philosophy , mechanical engineering , physics , quantum mechanics , engineering
In response to Z immerman's commentary, ‘Is collaboration a viable target for family therapists?’ we explore more conventional perspectives of therapeutic collaboration featured in the family therapy literature, including Z immerman's commentary. In particular, we critique essentialist and universal formulations that portray the client–therapist relationship to be inherently unequal as inconsistent and limiting. We conclude by addressing what appear to be some misunderstandings in Z immerman's commentary and clarify what we see as differences between his ideas and our stance on collaboration and power in family therapy.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here