Premium
Anomalies and stock returns: Australian evidence
Author(s) -
Gharghori Philip,
Lee Ronald,
Veeraraghavan Madhu
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
accounting and finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.645
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1467-629X
pISSN - 0810-5391
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-629x.2009.00298.x
Subject(s) - market liquidity , economics , equity (law) , leverage (statistics) , earnings , earnings surprise , monetary economics , stock (firearms) , financial economics , cash flow , econometrics , post earnings announcement drift , earnings response coefficient , finance , mechanical engineering , machine learning , political science , law , computer science , engineering
Prior research has identified the existence of several cross‐sectional patterns in equity returns, commonly referred to as effects. This paper tests for the existence of a number of well‐known effects using data from the Australian equities market. Specifically, we investigate the size effect, book‐to‐market effect, earnings‐to‐price effect, cashflow‐to‐price effect, leverage effect and the liquidity effect. An additional aim of this paper is to investigate the capability of the Fama–French model in explaining any observed effects. We document a size, book‐to‐market, earnings‐to‐price and cashflow‐to‐price effect but fail to find evidence of a leverage or liquidity effect. Although our findings indicate that the Fama–French model can partially explain some of the observed effects, we conclude that its performance is less than satisfactory in Australia.