Premium
AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE AUDIT EXPECTATION GAP: AUSTRALIAN EVIDENCE
Author(s) -
Monroe Gary S.,
Woodliff David R.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
accounting and finance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.645
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1467-629X
pISSN - 0810-5391
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-629x.1994.tb00262.x
Subject(s) - audit , accounting , shareholder , creditor , business , empirical evidence , psychology , corporate governance , finance , debt , philosophy , epistemology
This paper examines the existence and nature of the expectation gap in Australia and whether recent changes to the wording of audit reports have affected that gap. A mail questionnaire was completed by auditors, accountants, directors, creditors, shareholders and undergraduate students. There was a gap between auditors and the various user groups under the old report wording prior to the issuance of the revised AUP 3. The modified wording in the revised AUP 3 had a significant impact on beliefs about the nature of an audit and the relative responsibilities of auditors and management. The modified wording eliminated some of the differences, but also created some new differences in beliefs about the messages communicated through audit reports. The auditing profession's fears about an expectation gap appear to be justified.