Premium
SENSE AND SURPRISE IN COMPETITIVE TRADE THEORY
2010 WEAI PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS
Author(s) -
JONES RONALD W.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
economic inquiry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.823
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1465-7295
pISSN - 0095-2583
DOI - 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00335.x
Subject(s) - economics , simple (philosophy) , surprise , trade theory , production (economics) , general equilibrium theory , production theory , neoclassical economics , mathematical economics , microeconomics , positive economics , trade barrier , international trade , psychology , epistemology , social psychology , philosophy
Economic models are often judged by the reality of their assumptions or their success at predicting realistic outcomes. In this paper I suggest a different criterion for judging models in international trade theory in competitive settings: (i) Does the model conform to common sense in leading to results that even suggest the model is not necessary, and yet (ii) Can the same model be used as a tool to reveal in simple terms why certain outcomes that may appear surprising (often labeled a paradox in trade theory) nonetheless are correct. Many trade theory paradoxes appear as the result of income effects in simple general equilibrium models. Here attention centers instead on two of the familiar production models: the specific factors model and the Heckscher‐Ohlin model, either separately or when combined. It is shown that very basic properties of production underlie many of the surprising results in competitive trade theory. ( JEL F11, D50)