Premium
CRIMINAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AND JUDICIAL DISCRETION
Author(s) -
MICELI THOMAS J.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
contemporary economic policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.454
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1465-7287
pISSN - 1074-3529
DOI - 10.1111/j.1465-7287.2007.00065.x
Subject(s) - discretion , sentencing guidelines , judicial discretion , legislature , punishment (psychology) , context (archaeology) , ex ante , political science , criminal law , set (abstract data type) , law , law and economics , economics , criminology , judicial review , psychology , social psychology , sentence , macroeconomics , computer science , paleontology , artificial intelligence , biology , programming language
This article studies the institutional structure of criminal sentencing, focusing on the interaction between legislatures, which set sentencing ranges ex ante, and judges, who choose actual sentences from within those ranges ex post. The key question concerns the extent to which judges are afforded discretion in sentencing, given the possibly divergent interests of legislatures and judges regarding the social function of criminal punishment. The ongoing debate over federal sentencing guidelines provides a context for discussing the policy implications of the model. ( JEL K14, K42)