Premium
The influence of parents, siblings and peers on pre‐ and early‐teen smoking: A multilevel model
Author(s) -
KELLY ADRIAN B.,
O'FLAHERTY MARTIN,
CONNOR JASON P.,
HOMEL ROSS,
TOUMBOUROU JOHN W.,
PATTON GEORGE C.,
WILLIAMS JOANNE
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
drug and alcohol review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.018
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1465-3362
pISSN - 0959-5236
DOI - 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00231.x
Subject(s) - sibling , psychology , multilevel model , demography , socioeconomic status , peer group , disadvantage , sensation seeking , developmental psychology , peer influence , peer pressure , social psychology , environmental health , medicine , population , personality , machine learning , sociology , computer science , political science , law
and Aims. Despite considerable success in tobacco control, many teenagers in Australia and other industrialised countries still smoke tobacco. There is mixed evidence on the relative influence of proximal social networks (parents/siblings/peers) on pre‐ and early‐teen smoking, and no research has examined how these influences compare after accounting for school‐ and community‐level effects.The aim of this study was to compare the relative influences of parents, siblings and peers, after accounting for school‐ and community‐level variation in smoking.Design and Methods. A cross‐sectional fixed and random effects model of smoking prevalence was used, with individuals ( n = 7314) nested within schools ( n = 231) nested within communities ( n = 30). Grade 6 and 8 students (modal ages 11 and 13 years) completed an on‐line survey. Key variables included parent/sibling/peer use. Controls included alcohol involvement, sensation seeking, pro‐social beliefs, laws/norms about substance use and school commitment. Results. There was significant variation in smoking at both the school and community levels, supporting the need for a multilevel model. Individual‐level predictors accounted for much of the variance at higher levels. The strongest effects were for number of friends who smoke, sibling smoking and alcohol involvement. Smaller significant effects were found for parent smoking. At the community level, socioeconomic disadvantage was significant, but community‐level variance in pro‐social and drug‐related laws/norms was not related to smoking.Discussion and Conclusions. Cross‐level interactions were generally non‐significant. Early teenage smoking was best explained by sibling and peer smoking, and individual risks largely accounted for the substantial variation observed across schools and communities. In terms of future tobacco control, findings point to the utility of targeting families in disadvantaged communities. [Kelly AB, O'Flaherty M, Connor JP, Homel R, Toumbourou JW, Patton GC, Williams J. The influence of parents, siblings and peers on pre‐ and early‐teen smoking: A multilevel model. Drug Alcohol Rev 2011;30:381–387]