z-logo
Premium
Stability of haemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ) measurements from frozen whole blood samples stored for over a decade
Author(s) -
Selvin E.,
Coresh J.,
Jordahl J.,
Boland L.,
Steffes M. W.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
diabetic medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.474
H-Index - 145
eISSN - 1464-5491
pISSN - 0742-3071
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01705.x
Subject(s) - medicine , whole blood , reproducibility , blood preservation , hemoglobin , diabetes mellitus , chromatography , endocrinology , andrology , chemistry
Objective  Haemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ), a measure of long‐term glycaemic control, is at the centre of the clinical management of diabetes mellitus. However, the reproducibility of HbA 1c measurements from whole blood samples which have been in long‐term storage is unknown. We undertook this study to assess the reproducibility of HbA 1c measurements from whole blood samples that had been in storage at −70°C for over a decade. Research design and methods  Three hundred and thirty‐six samples of frozen whole blood from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, stored at −70°C for 11–14 years assayed for HbA 1c using a dedicated ion‐exchange HPLC assay (Tosoh A 1c 2.2 Plus HPLC) were compared with measurements on these same samples conducted prior to storage (in 1990–92) using a Diamat (Bio‐Rad) HPLC instrument. Results  HbA 1c measurements from long‐term stored samples were strongly correlated with values obtained prior to long‐term storage ( r =  0.97). The difference between HbA 1c from long‐ and short‐term stored samples had a mean of 0.35% HbA 1c ( sd  = 0.35) and a CV of 5.8%, which was approximately three times that of duplicate assays (CV 1.3 to 2.5%). Conclusions  These data demonstrate that highly correlated but more variable and slightly higher HbA 1c results were obtained from frozen whole blood samples that have been in storage for more than a decade. This highly reproducible assay performance would lead to comparable ranking of individuals and unbiased estimates of relative risks and odds ratios in epidemiological studies (case‐control and cohort designs), but results should be realigned when the absolute value is of interest. These results have important implications for epidemiological studies and clinical trials which have stored whole blood specimens.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here