Premium
Six years’ experience with high‐intensity focused ultrasonography for prostate cancer: oncological outcomes using the new ‘Stuttgart’ definition for biochemical failure
Author(s) -
Ripert Thomas,
Azémar MarieDominique,
Ménard Johann,
Barbe Coralie,
Messaoudi Rabah,
Bayoud Younes,
Pierrevelcin Jean,
Duval François,
Staerman Frédéric
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09710.x
Subject(s) - medicine , prostate cancer , hormonal therapy , cancer , retrospective cohort study , stage (stratigraphy) , surgery , salvage therapy , urology , chemotherapy , paleontology , biology
Study Type – Therapy (outcomes research) Level of Evidence 2b OBJECTIVE • To determine oncological outcomes after high‐intensity focused ultrasonography (HIFU) treatment in patients with localized prostate cancer using a new, more accurate, definition (‘Stuttgart’ definition) of biochemical failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS • We performed a retrospective review of all patients in our centre who received first‐line treatment with a second‐generation Ablatherm TM device (EDAP‐TMS, Lyon, France). • Oncological failure was given either by biochemical failure (prostate‐specific antigen, PSA, nadir plus 1.2 g/mL) (Stuttgart definition) or the start of salvage therapy because of a persistently positive biopsy after the HIFU procedure. • The 5‐year biochemical‐free survival rate and 5‐year disease‐free survival rate were calculated. RESULTS • In total, 53 patients were included (mean age, 72.5 ± 4.5 years, range 60–79 years; 28 low risk and 25 intermediate risk). None had undergone previous hormonal therapy. Mean ± sd follow‐up was 45.4 ± 15.5 months (range 16–71 years). Mean (range) pre‐treatment PSA was 8.5 ± 4 (0.29–18) ng/mL. The median (range) PSA nadir value was 1 (0.01–14) ng/mL and occurred after a mean (range) of 5.09 (3–24) months. • Overall, 36 patients (67.9%) experienced oncological failure. • These included 33 cases (62.2%) of biochemical failure. A PSA nadir of ≤0.2, 0.21–1.0 and >1 ng/mL was reached in 20.8%, 30.2% and 49% of patients, respectively, and was associated with biochemical failure in 9.1%, 30.3% and 60.6%, respectively. • The 5‐year biochemical‐free survival rate and disease‐free survival rate were 21.7% and 13.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a PSA nadir of >1 ng/mL was significantly associated with a risk of biochemical and oncological failure ( P = 0.002 and P < 0.001). • Oncological failure was not associated with any risk group. • No patient died from prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS • In our experience, Ablatherm TM treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer was associated with a high rate of biochemical failure as determined by the ‘Stuttgart’ definition, and did not achieve effective cancer control. • The PSA nadir value after HIFU treatment was a significant predictor of treatment failure.