z-logo
Premium
Adjuvant versus salvage radiation therapy for prostate cancer and the risk of death
Author(s) -
D’Amico Anthony V.,
Chen MingHui,
Sun Leon,
Lee W. Robert,
Mouraviev Vladimir,
Robertson Cary N.,
Walther Philip J.,
Polascik Thomas J.,
Albala David M.,
Moul Judd W.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09447.x
Subject(s) - medicine , prostatectomy , prostate cancer , hazard ratio , urology , salvage therapy , prostate specific antigen , adjuvant , adverse effect , confidence interval , proportional hazards model , radiation therapy , oncology , hormonal therapy , adjuvant therapy , cancer , chemotherapy
Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To investigate whether salvage radiation therapy (RT) for prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) failure can provide the same result as adjuvant RT, which decreases the risk of all‐cause mortality (ACM) for men with positive margins (R1), or extra‐capsular or seminal vesicle extension (pT3). METHODS We studied 1638 men at Duke University who underwent radical prostatectomy for unfavourable‐risk prostate cancer and whose postoperative PSA was undetectable. Cox regression was used to evaluate whether salvage vs adjuvant RT in men with a rapid (<10 months) or slow (≥10 months) PSA doubling time (DT) was associated with the risk of ACM, adjusting for adverse features (pT3, R1, Gleason score 8–10), age, preoperative PSA level, comorbidity and hormonal therapy use. RESULTS Despite fewer men with two or more adverse features (61 vs 82%; P  = 0.016), salvage for a rapid PSA DT vs adjuvant RT increased the risk of ACM [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 3.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.27–9.20; P  = 0.015]. There was no difference (AHR = 1.39; 95% CI = 0.50–3.90; P  = 0.53) in the risk of ACM among men who received salvage for a slow PSA DT or adjuvant RT. Nearly all (90%) men with a slow PSA DT had Gleason score ≤7 and the majority (59%) had at most pT3 or R1 disease. CONCLUSION Radiation therapy after PSA failure as compared with adjuvant RT was not associated with an increased risk of ACM in men with Gleason score ≤7 and pT3R0 or pT2R1 disease.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here