z-logo
Premium
Intraoperative frozen section assessment of pelvic lymph nodes during radical prostatectomy is of limited value
Author(s) -
Song Jie,
Li Mei,
Zagaja Gregory P.,
Taxy Jerome B.,
Shalhav Arieh L.,
AlAhmadie Hikmat A.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09402.x
Subject(s) - medicine , prostatectomy , metastasis , frozen section procedure , lymph , dissection (medical) , radiology , false positive paradox , urology , surgery , nuclear medicine , prostate cancer , cancer , pathology , machine learning , computer science
Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To evaluate the accuracy of frozen section (FS) assessment of pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in a large contemporary cohort; and to analyse the contribution of FS to surgical decision making in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS During a 4‐year period at a single institution, RPs with PLN dissection (PLND) were reviewed. The number and size of the PLNs, and the size of metastases were measured. RESULTS FS was performed on 349 bilateral PLNDs. Overall, 28 (8%) cases were positive for metastasis, 11 of which were detected by FS (39%). The 17 false negatives, all of which contained metastases smaller than 5 mm, were due to failure to identify and freeze the positive PLNs (11), failure to section at the level of the metastatic tumour (four), or interpretative error (two). The sensitivity was not affected by the number of sampled nodes. The size of metastasis was the determining factor for the accuracy of FS, with metastases of ≥5 mm having a sensitivity of 100%, and metastases of <5 mm having a sensitivity of 10%. Among the 11 true positives, RP was aborted in eight cases and continued in three. During the same period, 261 PLNDs were performed without FS, and 18 (6.9%) had metastases. CONCLUSIONS FS is highly accurate in detecting large, grossly evident metastases, but performs poorly on micrometastases. It is recommended that a two‐step approach applied to routine FS starting with a careful gross examination followed by FS for only grossly suspicious PLNs.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here