Premium
Advances in the management of blunt traumatic bladder rupture: experience with 36 cases
Author(s) -
Wirth Gregory J.,
Peter Robin,
Poletti PierreAlexandre,
Iselin Christophe E.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09377.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cystography , surgery , blunt , blunt trauma , concomitant , radiology , laparoscopy , general surgery , urinary system
Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To assess how advances in urology, radiology and orthopaedics are changing the current management of bladder ruptures, by reviewing patients treated for bladder ruptures after blunt trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Our database was screened for patients admitted with bladder ruptures between 1980 and 2008. Charts were reviewed for demographics, clinical variables, diagnostics, treatment and outcome. RESULTS Thirty‐six patients with extraperitoneal (EPR, 61%) and intraperitoneal (IPR) or combined ruptures (39%) were identified; 81% of them presented pelvic‐ring fractures. Diagnosis relied on computed tomography cystography (CT‐C), which has replaced plain‐film cystography. The sensitivity of either type of cystography was >90%. However, three bladder ruptures (11%) were missed on CT‐C performed with insufficient bladder distension. All 14 patients with IPRs had immediate surgical repair, four of them by laparoscopy. Twelve of 22 EPRs (55%) were sutured during concomitant orthopaedic/visceral surgery or because of the urologist’s apprehension of infection. Only eight of 22 patients with EPR (36%) completed conservative treatment. CONCLUSIONS Diagnosis relies increasingly on CT‐C, allowing simultaneous assessment of multiple organ systems. However, only specific CT‐C guarantees an adequate sensitivity. Orthopaedists increasingly use open reductions and fixation of pelvic‐ring fractures, prompting urologists to suture EPRs simultaneously. Our data indicate that this proactive management reduces infectious complications, and we have adopted it as the standard of care in our institution. Laparoscopic suture is an advantageous treatment of isolated IPR.