z-logo
Premium
Long‐term follow‐up of 3‐month neoadjuvant hormone therapy before radical prostatectomy in a randomized trial
Author(s) -
Yee David S.,
Lowrance William T.,
Eastham James A.,
Maschino Alexandra C.,
Cronin Angel M.,
Rabbani Farhang
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.08698.x
Subject(s) - medicine , biochemical recurrence , urology , hazard ratio , randomized controlled trial , prostatectomy , prostate cancer , confidence interval , hormone therapy , oncology , surgery , cancer , breast cancer
Study Type – Therapy (RCT)
Level of Evidence 1b OBJECTIVE To report our long‐term follow‐up of an institutional randomized prospective trial of radical prostatectomy (RP) with or without a 3‐month course of neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT), which results in pathological downstaging, but generally no reduction in biochemical recurrence (BCR) on early follow‐up (at 3 years). PATIENTS AND METHODS From December 1992 to June 1996, 148 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were randomized to RP only or 3 months of goserelin acetate and flutamide before RP. BCR was defined as a detectable serum prostate specific antigen level (>0.1 ng/mL) at least 6 weeks after surgery, with a confirmatory increase. RESULTS The median follow‐up for BCR‐free patients was 8 years. There was no significant difference in BCR‐free probabilities between groups ( P  = 0.7). The BCR‐free probability at 7 years was 78% for patients undergoing RP only and 80% for patients undergoing NHT and RP (difference of 2%; 95% confidence interval, CI, 12–16%). A Cox regression showed no significant relationship between NHT and BCR (hazard ratio 1.16; 95% CI, 0.56–2.39, P  = 0.7). Overall, two patients had local recurrence and six developed metastases, and were evenly distributed among the RP only and NHT groups. CONCLUSION Although our study was not originally powered to detect differences in BCR, there was no overall benefit in BCR‐free probability, local recurrence or metastasis with 3 months of NHT at 8 years of follow‐up. Pending evidence of improvement in patient outcomes, NHT before RP appears to be unjustified outside of clinical trials.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here