Premium
Comparison of type I and II papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and clear cell RCC
Author(s) -
Waldert Matthias,
Haitel Andrea,
Marberger Michael,
Katzenbeisser Daniela,
Ozsoy Mehmet,
Stadler Elisabeth,
Remzi Mesut
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.07999.x
Subject(s) - chromophobe cell , medicine , clear cell , papillary renal cell carcinomas , renal cell carcinoma , clear cell renal cell carcinoma , pathological , nephrectomy , stage (stratigraphy) , hazard ratio , clear cell carcinoma , urology , carcinoma , oncology , pathology , gastroenterology , kidney , biology , paleontology , confidence interval
OBJECTIVE To compare the pathological features of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with papillary RCC (pRCC) and further differentiate type I and II pRCC as independent prognosticators for survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS From September 1994 to February 2007 557 RCCs were treated and reviewed. All patients underwent radical nephrectomy or nephron‐sparing surgery. We reviewed patient data and correlated RCC subtypes to tumour size, pathological stage, nuclear grade, and 5‐year cancer‐specific survival (CSS). pRCC was re‐evaluated in to type I and II. The 2002 Tumour‐Node‐Metastasis and Fuhrman classifications were used. RESULTS In all, 391 (70%) patients had ccRCC, 96 (17%) had pRCC, 34 (6%) had chromophobe RCC, seven (1%) had ductus Bellini RCC and 29 (5%) had unclassified RCC. Upon re‐evaluation 34 patients had type I pRCC and 62 had type II. The pRCCs were significantly smaller than the ccRCCs, at a mean ( sd ) of 4.5 (2.5) cm vs 5 (2.9) cm ( P = 0.013), and multifocal (25% vs 12%, P = 0.001). Whereas patients with ccRCC had significantly more primary metastases (12% vs 3%, P = 0.014). The mean ( sd ) follow‐up was 42.3 (41.4) months. The 5‐year CSS for M0 patients was 84% for ccRCC and 90% for pRCC ( P = 0.573). At multivariate analyses predictors for 5‐year CSS were only tumour size (hazard ratio, HR 2.6, P < 0.001), pathological stage (HR 3.9, P < 0.001) and nuclear grade (HR 2.7, P < 0.001). The type I and II pRCCs had significantly different lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and 5‐year CSS rates (94% vs 74%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS The ccRCCs were significantly larger at diagnosis than the pRCCs. The histological subtype (pRCC vs ccRCC) had no impact on the 5‐year CSS in multivariate analyses. The type I and II pRCCs had similar histopathological features except for a significant difference in LVI. However, the 5‐year CSS was significantly different in type I and II pRCC.