Premium
‘I WILL NOT CUT . . . ’: THE OATH THAT DEFINED UROLOGY
Author(s) -
Herr Harry W.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.07796.x
Subject(s) - hippocratic oath , oath , lithotomy position , medicine , relevance (law) , alternative medicine , classics , urology , law , history , political science , pathology , psychiatry
OBJECTIVE To explore different interpretations of the clause embedded in the Hippocratic Oath, prohibiting surgery for stones, and its relevance for urology. METHODS Various translations of the Oath, from the original Greek edition to historical revisions, were reviewed. RESULTS Controversy surrounds different translations and interpretations of the Oath about the practice of lithotomy among ancient healers. The reasons Hippocratic physicians were prohibited from performing lithotomy are several, but the consensus is that untrained physicians pledged not to undertake such a complicated procedure, but to refer their patients to other healers who specialized in that practice. CONCLUSION The Hippocratic Oath actually defined, identified and legitimized urology as the first medical speciality.