Premium
The effect of male circumcision on sexual satisfaction and function, results from a randomized trial of male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus prevention, Rakai, Uganda
Author(s) -
Kigozi Godfrey,
Watya Stephen,
Polis Chelsea B.,
Buwembo Denis,
Kiggundu Valerian,
Wawer Maria J.,
Serwadda David,
Nalugoda Fred,
Kiwanuka Noah,
Bacon Melanie C.,
Ssempijja Victor,
Makumbi Frederick,
Gray Ronald H.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.07369.x
Subject(s) - male circumcision , medicine , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , randomized controlled trial , sexual function , demography , erectile dysfunction , gynecology , population , family medicine , environmental health , sociology , health services
Associate Editor Michael G. Wyllie Editorial Board Ian Eardley, UK Jean Fourcroy, USA Sidney Glina, Brazil Julia Heiman, USA Chris McMahon, Australia Bob Millar, UK Alvaro Morales, Canada Michael Perelman, USA Marcel Waldinger, Netherlands OBJECTIVE To investigate the relationship between adult male circumcision and sexual satisfaction and function in men, as observational studies on the effect of adult male circumcision on sexual satisfaction show conflicting results. SUBJECTS AND METHODS We investigated self‐reported sexual satisfaction and function among men enrolled in a randomized trial of male circumcision for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention conducted in Rakai, Uganda. In all, 4456 sexually experienced HIV‐negative males aged 15–49 years were enrolled; 2210 were randomized to receive immediate circumcision (intervention arm) and 2246 to circumcision delayed for 24 months (control arm). Men were followed up at 6, 12 and 24 months, and information on sexual desire, satisfaction and erectile dysfunction was collected. These variables were compared between the study arms and over time within the study arms, using chi‐square or Fisher’s exact tests. The trial registration number is NCT00425984. RESULTS There were no differences between the study arms at enrolment and problems with sexual satisfaction and function were reported by <2% of participants in both study arms at all time points. At 6 months, no difficulty with penetration was reported by 98.6% of circumcised men and 99.4% of controls ( P = 0.02), and no pain on intercourse was reported by 99.4% circumcised and 98.8% of uncircumcised men ( P = 0.05). There were no differences between the study arms in penetration or dyspareunia at later visits. Sexual satisfaction increased from 98.0% at enrolment to 99.9% at 2 years among the controls ( P < 0.001), but there was no trend in satisfaction among circumcised men (enrolment 98.5%, 2 years 98.4%, P = 0.8). CONCLUSION Adult male circumcision does not adversely affect sexual satisfaction or clinically significant function in men.