z-logo
Premium
A modified sigma‐rectum pouch (Mainz pouch II) technique: analysis of outcomes and complications on 220 patients
Author(s) -
HADZIDJOKIC JOVAN B.,
BASIC DRAGOSLAV T.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2006.05995.x
Subject(s) - medicine , pouch , surgery , anastomosis , ileus , stenosis , rectum
The Mainz II pouch was introduced as an acceptable alternative type of urinary diversion, and has become widely recognised as such. The one paper in this section describes the use of this technique, using a modification described by the authors, in 220 patients with a median follow‐up of 21 months. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified technique for a sigma‐rectum pouch (Mainz pouch II). PATIENTS AND METHODS Between October 1994 and March 2003, a modified Mainz pouch II was constructed in 220 patients (153 men and 67 women, mean age 56.7 years) in a multicentre prospective study. The median follow‐up (177 patients, 81%) was 21 (1–84) months. RESULTS There were no peri‐operative deaths; there were early complications in 24 patients, including prolonged ileus in six, pyelonephritis in 17, unilateral ureterohydronephrosis in 11, bilateral ureterohydronephrosis in two, and incipient renal failure in five. Late complications included ureteric implantation‐site stenosis (unilateral in eight patients and bilateral in three). In all, 92 patients (52%) needed oral alkalizing medications and potassium supplementation because of hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis. All but three patients (99%) were continent by day and at night. The mean ( sd ) voiding frequency was 4.2 (1.6) voids by day and 2.1 (0.5) at night. CONCLUSION The Mainz pouch II is a simple and reproducible surgical technique, with good results in terms of mortality, morbidity, continence and overall quality of life. The main limitation is malignant transformation of the uretero‐intestinal anastomosis. For selected cases, the technique is a good alternative to other types of continent urinary diversion.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here