Premium
Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures
Author(s) -
MINERVINI ANDREA,
RALPH DAVID J.,
PRYOR JOHN P.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2005.05907.x
Subject(s) - penile prosthesis , medicine , prosthesis , erectile dysfunction , surgery , sexual intercourse , population , environmental health
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the outcome of penile prosthesis surgery for different types of prosthesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS The notes of 447 men who had 504 penile prosthesis implanted between August 1975 and December 2000 were evaluated. Of the prostheses inserted, 393 were malleable, 81 were three‐piece inflatable and 30 were self‐contained hydraulic prostheses. The mean (range) age of the men was 52 (21–78) years; 404 men had primary implants and 43 had revision surgery after operations at other institutions. The mean follow‐up was 50 (1–297) months. RESULTS Of the 447 men, 22 were lost to follow‐up immediately after surgery. The most serious postoperative complications were infection (8%) and erosion (5%), which was more common in diabetic patients (10%) and after pelvic trauma with a urethral injury (21%). Of 482 prostheses, 21 failed mechanically (4%) and revision surgery was needed for 5% of the prostheses inserted (24/482). Overall, 89% (377/425) of men could have sexual intercourse and 344 (81%) were satisfied with the results. CONCLUSIONS Of the men implanted with a penile prosthesis, 81% were satisfied with the outcome and an even higher proportion were satisfied with the inflatable prostheses. Dissatisfaction was mainly due to complications that resulted in removal of the prosthesis.