z-logo
Premium
Variation in patterns of practice in diagnosing screen‐detected prostate cancer
Author(s) -
Nam Robert K.,
Toi Ants,
Trachtenberg John,
Jewett Michael A.S.,
Klotz Laurence,
Fleshner Neil,
Bagnell P. Scott,
Sweet Joan,
Sugar Linda,
Narod Steven A.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.05150.x
Subject(s) - prostate cancer , biopsy , medicine , intraepithelial neoplasia , prostate biopsy , prostate , rectal examination , prostate specific antigen , cancer , atypia , urology , high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia , odds ratio , gynecology , pathology
OBJECTIVE To determine the practice pattern of repeat prostate biopsies to detect prostate cancer, as there is growing evidence to support the recommendation that a repeat prostate biopsy should be taken after an initially negative prostate biopsy, the rate of cancer detection then being ≈ 30%. PATIENTS AND METHODS We examined the practice patterns of taking a repeat prostate biopsy after an initial negative biopsy and the predictors for cancer at repeat biopsy among 1536 patients who had an initial prostate biopsy because of an elevated prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level (>4.0 ng/mL) or abnormal digital rectal examination. RESULTS Of the 1536 men, 712 (46.4%) had cancer detected on the first biopsy; of the remaining 824 with no cancer detected, 268 (32.5%) had a repeat biopsy within a year, and 68 of these (25.4%) had cancer detected. Of the cancers detected at repeat biopsy, 31% were high‐grade. Men with abnormal histology (prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypia) had an odds ratio of 3.2 ( P  < 0.001) for having a repeat biopsy. For men with normal initial prostate histology, those with an initial PSA of 10.0–20.0 and >20.0 ng/mL had an odds ratio of 3.6 and 4.5 (both P  < 0.001), respectively, for a repeat prostate biopsy, compared with patients with a PSA of <10.0 ng/mL. However, the PSA level was not predictive of prostate cancer at repeat biopsy, but age and prostate volume were. CONCLUSIONS A third of patients had a repeat biopsy after a negative biopsy. The most important factors influencing whether a patient was to have a repeat biopsy were initial biopsy histology and PSA level. However, the latter was not an important factor for predicting prostate cancer at repeat biopsy.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here