Premium
Urethral replacement: a comparison between small intestinal submucosa grafts and spontaneous regeneration
Author(s) -
ElAssmy Ahmed,
ElHamid Mohamed Abd,
Hafez Ashraf T.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
bju international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 1464-4096
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.05115.x
Subject(s) - urethra , submucosa , medicine , regeneration (biology) , muscular layer , surgery , urethrotomy , urology , anatomy , urethral stricture , histology , pathology , biology , microbiology and biotechnology
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the use of commercially available single‐layer small intestinal submucosa (SIS) for urethral replacement, both as an onlay and as a tube, in a rabbit model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty‐six male rabbits were assigned to four experimental groups. Group 1 had the ventral wall of the penile urethra excised for 15 mm; in group 2 this created defect was patched with a SIS onlay graft; group 3 had complete excision of a 15 mm segment of the penile urethra; and in group 4, this created defect was replaced with a SIS tube graft. In all rabbits the urethra was stented for 2 weeks. A retrograde urethrogram was taken in all rabbits before death at 3, 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. The urethra was then exposed, examined carefully and excised for histopathological examination. RESULTS In groups 1 and 2 the retrograde urethrograms were normal in 13 rabbits and there was relative narrowing in two rabbits in group 1 and three in group 2. In groups 3 and 4 all rabbits developed urethral fistulae or strictures. Histological examination of the urethra showed epithelial regeneration supported by smooth muscle backing in all rabbits in group 1, while rabbits in group 2 showed no regeneration of smooth muscle. By contrast, rabbits in groups 3 and 4 showed incomplete regeneration and progressive fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS Single‐layer SIS is not a suitable urethral substitute in this animal model. When used as an onlay, healing is inferior to spontaneous urethral regeneration, as SIS impedes smooth muscle cell regeneration. When used as a tube, there is complete scarring and urethral luminal occlusion.