z-logo
Premium
Comparison of Nephrostomy Drainage Systems
Author(s) -
McLOUGHLIN J.,
FARAH N.,
WILLIAMS GORDON
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
british journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 0007-1331
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb16283.x
Subject(s) - drainage , medicine , nephrostomy , drainage system (geomorphology) , surgery , ecology , percutaneous , biology
Summary Forty patients undergoing nephrostomy insertion were randomised into 2 groups: those maintained on intermittently closed and those on permanently closed drainage systems. The average cost of managing a patient in the former group was one‐eighth that of the latter and was not associated with any increase in morbidity.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here