Premium
Ploidy and Prognosis in Renal Carcinoma
Author(s) -
LANIGAN D.,
McLEAN P. A.,
MURPHY D. M.,
DONOVAN M. G.,
CURRAN B.,
LEADER M.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
british journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 0007-1331
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb15873.x
Subject(s) - aneuploidy , ploidy , renal cell carcinoma , pathology , flow cytometry , carcinoma , prognostic variable , stage (stratigraphy) , renal carcinoma , medicine , biology , oncology , cancer , immunology , chromosome , paleontology , biochemistry , gene
Summary The value of tumour ploidy status as a prognostic indicator in renal carcinoma is disputed. In this retrospective study the DNA content of 90 primary and 10 secondary renal cell carcinomas was measured using flow cytometry. Data on recurrence and survival were available in all cases. Tumours were staged according to the TNM system and histological grade was based on nuclear morphology. Formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded material was processed using standard techniques. Multiple samples were examined in 19 cases. Of the primary tumours, 52 were diploid, 24 were aneuploid and 6 were tetraploid; 8 patients had uninterpretable histograms. Ploidy of the secondary tumours was similar to that of their respective primaries. Aneuploidy correlated with higher grade but not with TNM category and, although associated with an increased risk of death, did not provide independent prognostic information. Heterogeneity of ploidy was found in 6 of the 19 cases where more than 1 sample was assessed. It was concluded that tumour DNA content in renal carcinoma is weakly linked to outcome, is subject to sample error and does not provide accurate prognostic information as a single independent variable.