Premium
Ureteroscopy under Local Anaesthesia with and without Intravenous Analgesia
Author(s) -
VÖGELI T.A.,
MELLIN H.E.,
HOPF B.,
ACKERMANN R.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
british journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 0007-1331
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb00679.x
Subject(s) - medicine , alfentanil , ureteroscopy , general anaesthesia , anesthesia , extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy , morphine , surgery , regional anaesthesia , lithotripsy , ureter , propofol
Summary— In a prospective study of 302 ureteroscopic procedures, 161 were commenced and 133 completed without the use of general or regional anaesthesia. In 15 patients ureteroscopy (URS) was performed with lignocaine jelly in the urethra only, and in 118 with additional intravenous analgesia. Alfentanil, a synthetic morphine derivative, was used for intravenous analgesia. Ureteroscopy was performed prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in 46 patients, for stone basketing in 40, for stone fragmentation in 29, for diagnostic purposes in 14 and for cold knife ureterotomy in 4. Ureteric lesions were observed in 9 patients (6.8%) treated under intravenous sedoanalgesia. This percentage is within the range reported in other series of patients treated under general anaesthesia. The findings suggest that URS, when performed without general or regional anaesthesia, does not increase the risk of complications or compromise the results of treatment.