Premium
Urological Audit: the Role for an Aggressive Approach to High Grade Superficial Bladder Tumours
Author(s) -
MOHAMED S. R.,
MISHRIKI S. F.,
PERSAD R. A.,
ABRAMS P.,
GINGELL J. C.,
FENELEY R. C. L.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
british journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 0007-1331
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1992.tb15695.x
Subject(s) - medicine , audit , cystoscopy , resection , standard of care , general surgery , surgery , urinary system , management , economics
Summary— A retrospective study was undertaken of the different treatment modalities for bladder tumours under the care of 3 consultants in the urology department of a district general hospital. The aim was to review the results of the various forms of treatment. In all, 261 patients' case records were reviewed and 19 variables extracted. There was an average delay of 4.2 months from the onset of symptoms to the initial cystoscopy. Over 50% of high grade tumours were invasive on initial presentation (G3T2/G3T3). A range of treatments for the more aggressive tumours was adopted by the urologists, ranging from a conservative resection (TURBT) to an aggressive approach (cystourethrectomy) at the earliest sign of progression. A strong association between aggressive treatment and higher survival was noted. This study has proved valuable in demonstrating to the urology team the value of routine audit and questioning “established” surgical practice. As a result, a more standard regime for the treatment of bladder tumours has been advocated and a prospective randomised controlled trial will be introduced.