Premium
Is Pre‐operative Imaging of the Urinary Tract Worthwhile in the Assessment of Prostatism?
Author(s) -
WILKINSON A. G.,
WILD S. R.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
british journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 0007-1331
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1992.tb15664.x
Subject(s) - prostatism , medicine , radiology , urinary system , ultrasound , pelvis , urology , urination , abnormality , prostate , prostate disease , cancer , psychiatry
Summary— The reports of routine pre‐operative imaging investigations performed on patients presenting with symptoms of uncomplicated benign prostatic hypertrophy were compared with management decisions and clinical outcome. In 175 patients with prostatism no urological abnormality which altered management was discovered on plain films of the abdomen and pelvis and ultrasound of the urinary tract which were performed routinely. Post‐micturition residual volume (PMRV), estimated by ultrasound, was compared with the maximum urine flow rate (Q max) in 57 patients. PMRV showed negative correlation with Q max. Both high PMRV and low Q max were associated with the urologist's decision to operate, but multiple logistic regression revealed that ultrasound residual volume was not a significant predictor of operation when adjusted for Q max. Urologists in this hospital therefore use flow rates as the primary indication of the need to operate. We suggest that no routine pre‐operative imaging need be performed in patients presenting with prostatism.