Premium
Ethics, Logistics and a Trial of Transurethral versus Open Prostatectomy
Author(s) -
JENKINS B. J.,
SHARMA P.,
BADENOCH D. F.,
FOWLER C. G.,
BLANDY J. P.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
british journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 0007-1331
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1992.tb15561.x
Subject(s) - open prostatectomy , medicine , prostatectomy , urology , randomized controlled trial , open surgery , surgery , general surgery , prostate cancer , cancer
Summary— An increased long‐term morbidity rate after transurethral compared with open prostatectomy has recently been claimed on the basis of retrospective studies of operations done up to 20 years ago. These studies have led to a demand for a prospective trial. Most reports show that peri‐operative mortality following prostatectomy is virtually confined to unfit men over 80 years old. Before agreeing to participate in a trial we examined our operative mortality in this group of patients. Between 1981 and 1987, 123 octogenarians underwent transurethral prostatectomy: 64 operations were elective and 59 were performed for retention. There were 2 operative deaths (1.6%), both from gram‐negative septicaemia despite prophylactic antibiotics. There were no additional deaths in the first 12 months following surgery. Few of these patients would have been considered fit to undergo an open prostatectomy. Any proposed randomised trial would have to exclude such high risk patients until it can be shown that open prostatectomy is equally safe.