Premium
Low Temperature and Conventional Scanning Electron Microscopy of Human Urothelium
Author(s) -
STAFF W. G.,
MIDDLETON J. F. S.,
MORRIS J. A.,
OATES K.
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
british journal of urology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.773
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1464-410X
pISSN - 0007-1331
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1985.tb08975.x
Subject(s) - urothelium , scanning electron microscope , materials science , electron microscope , microscopy , scanning confocal electron microscopy , nanotechnology , biophysics , optics , physics , biology , composite material , urinary bladder , medicine , urology
Summary— The appearance of fixed dehydrated non‐neoplastic human urothelium viewed by conventional scanning electron microscopy (CSEM) is different from that of frozen hydrated human urothelium viewed by low temperature scanning electron microscopy (LTSEM). In the fixed dehydrated material the surface is formed by well defined, polygonal, domed superficial urothelial cells which have prominent surface microridges. In places intermediate urothelial cells are visible and they have surface microvilli. In the frozen hydrated material viewed by LTSEM most of the surface is smooth. This is formed in part by a glutaraldehyde soluble extracellular secretion which may be a mucin barrier to bacteria. We believe that the rest of the smooth surface is formed by superficial urothelial cells which are not well defined and which lack microridges. There are islands of rounded cells lacking microvilli which are probably intermediate urothelial cells as they correspond in appearance with the intermediate urothelial cells seen in freeze fractured material. It seems likely that fixation and dehydration will cause some change in surface configuration and in theory the frozen hydrated material should more closely resemble the natural state. We believe that LTSEM will be of value in investigating normal and diseased urothelium.