Premium
The Convergent Validity of Four Burnout Measures in a Chinese Sample: A Confirmatory Factor‐Analytic Approach
Author(s) -
Qiao Hu,
Schaufeli Wilmar B.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
applied psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.497
H-Index - 88
eISSN - 1464-0597
pISSN - 0269-994X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00428.x
Subject(s) - burnout , convergent validity , psychology , structural equation modeling , confirmatory factor analysis , construct validity , sample (material) , clinical psychology , social psychology , psychometrics , statistics , mathematics , chromatography , internal consistency , chemistry
The purpose of this paper is to study the convergent validity of the four most widely used burnout measures in a sample of Chinese nurses ( N = 717). First, Structural Equation Modeling was used to investigate the factor structure of scores produced by the Maslach Burnout Inventory‐General Survey (MBI‐GS), the Burnout Measure (BM), the Shirom‐Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM), and the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI). Next, several competing models were tested to investigate the convergent validity of these four burnout instruments. The final results suggest that burnout is best conceived of as a multidimensional construct consisting of exhaustion and withdrawal, which are two related but conceptually distinct aspects. In addition, positively phrased items should be dropped from burnout measures for they constitute a separate factor that is considered to be an artifact.