z-logo
Premium
The Question of a Vomer in Brachiopterygian Fish
Author(s) -
Bjerring Hans C.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
acta zoologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.414
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1463-6395
pISSN - 0001-7272
DOI - 10.1111/j.1463-6395.1991.tb01200.x
Subject(s) - vomer , biology , fish <actinopterygii> , anatomy , skull , evolutionary biology , fishery
The term vomer was coined over four centuries ago to denote one of the 23 bones normally comprising an adult human skull. As time went on more and more craniates were designated vomerate. To date, however, the issue as to whether brachiopterygian fish are or are not vomerate has remained unresolved. Those who consider these fish to be vomerate have suggested at least three different palatal bones as the homologue of the human vomer. Examination of embryological material of Polypterus senegalus shows that this brachiopterygian actually develops a vomer which eventually becomes united indistinguishably with the anterior part of the parasphenoid. The vomer is suggested to have arisen through the fusion of dental plates belonging to a supplementary set of buccopharyngeal denticulate bones. The other subethmoidal bones of the brachiopterygian palate seem likely to be derivatives of the tooth plates which originally were applied to the first two pairs of infrapharyngeals. When these endoskeletal elements were put to use for encapsulation of the organs of smell early in craniate phylogeny, some of the tooth plates that covered their inner surfaces fused to provide anterior palatal bones. Identified at one time or another as vomers, these bones are here termed glochinals and dacnils.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here