Premium
A randomized, parallel group, double‐blind, multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of Avandamet (rosiglitazone/metformin) and metformin on long‐term glycaemic control and bone mineral density after 80 weeks of treatment in drug‐na ï ve type 2 diabetes mellitus patients
Author(s) -
Borges J. L. C.,
Bilezikian J. P.,
JonesLeone A. R.,
Acusta A. P.,
Ambery P. D.,
Nino A. J.,
Grosse M.,
Fitzpatrick L. A.,
Cobitz A. R.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01461.x
Subject(s) - medicine , bone mineral , metformin , rosiglitazone , femoral neck , urology , randomized controlled trial , bone density , type 2 diabetes , diabetes mellitus , surgery , gastroenterology , endocrinology , osteoporosis
Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if superior glycaemic control could be achieved with Avandamet® (rosiglitazone/metformin/AVM) compared with metformin (MET) monotherapy, and if glycaemic effects attained with AVM are durable over 18 months of treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone biomarkers were evaluated in a subgroup of patients. Methods: This was a phase IV, randomized, double‐blind, multi‐centre study in 688, drug naÏve, male and female patients who had an established clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio either to AVM or MET. Results: As initial therapy in patients with T2DM, AVM was superior to MET in achieving statistically significant reductions in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (p < 0.0001) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (p < 0.001), with more patients reaching recommended HbA1c and FPG targets for intensive glycaemic control. The glycaemic effects attained with AVM compared to MET monotherapy were durable over 18 months of treatment. In the bone substudy, AVM was associated with a significantly lower BMD in comparison with MET at week 80 in the lumbar spine and total hip (p < 0.0012 and p = 0.0005, respectively). Between‐treatment differences were not statistically significant for distal one‐third of radius BMD, femoral neck BMD or total BMD. Conclusion: Superior glycaemic control was achieved with AVM compared with MET monotherapy. The superior glycaemic effects were shown to be durable over 18 months of treatment. AVM was associated with a significantly reduced BMD in comparison with MET at week 80 in the lumbar spine and total hip.