z-logo
Premium
Continuation versus discontinuation of insulin secretagogues when initiating insulin in type 2 diabetes
Author(s) -
Swinnen S. G.,
Dain M.P.,
Mauricio D.,
DeVries J. H.,
Hoekstra J. B.,
Holleman F.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01258.x
Subject(s) - metformin , insulin , medicine , endocrinology , type 2 diabetes , discontinuation , insulin glargine , secretagogue , basal (medicine) , insulin detemir , diabetes mellitus , basal insulin
We compared the combined use of basal insulin, metformin and insulin secretagogues with a combination of basal insulin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes starting basal insulin analogue therapy. This analysis was part of a 24‐week trial, in which 964 insulin‐naive patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral agents (including metformin) were randomized to insulin glargine or detemir. Secretagogues were stopped or maintained at the site‐investigators' discretion. During the study, 57.6% of patients continued their secretagogue treatment. Compared with patients stopping secretagogues, those who continued experienced significantly more hypoglycaemia and weight gain. Insulin doses, however, were significantly lower: 0.6 ± 0.4 versus 0.8 ± 0.4 U/kg/day (p < 0.001). The difference between groups in mean HbA1c reduction was not statistically significant. In conclusion, in type 2 diabetic patients starting basal insulin analogue therapy, continuing both metformin and secretagogues results in more hypoglycaemia and weight gain and lower insulin doses than only maintaining metformin.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here