Premium
Effects of vildagliptin on glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with a sulphonylurea *
Author(s) -
Garber A. J.,
Foley J. E.,
Banerji M. A.,
Ebeling P.,
Gudbjörnsdottir S.,
Camisasca R.P.,
Couturier A.,
Baron M. A.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00859.x
Subject(s) - vildagliptin , medicine , placebo , postprandial , tolerability , glimepiride , diabetes mellitus , type 2 diabetes , endocrinology , hypoglycemia , adverse effect , gastroenterology , alternative medicine , pathology
Aim: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin vs. placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are inadequately controlled [haemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ) 7.5 to 11%] with prior sulphonylurea (SU) monotherapy. Methods: This 24‐week, multicentre, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study assessed the effects of the dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor vildagliptin (50 mg given once or twice daily) vs. placebo added to glimepiride (4 mg once daily) in 515 patients with T2DM. Adjusted mean changes from baseline to end‐point (AMΔ) in HbA 1c , fasting plasma glucose, fasting lipids and body weight were compared by analysis of covariance. Results: The between‐group difference (vildagliptin − placebo) in AMΔ HbA 1c was −0.6 ± 0.1% in patients receiving vildagliptin 50 mg daily and −0.7 ± 0.1% in those receiving 100 mg daily (p < 0.001 vs. placebo for both). Greater efficacy was seen in patients ≥65 years of age (−0.7 ± 0.1% and −0.8 ± 0.2% for 50 and 100 mg daily respectively) and in patients with baseline HbA 1c > 9% (Δ = −1.0 ± 0.2% and −0.9 ± 0.2% for 50 and 100 mg daily respectively). Relative to placebo, patients receiving vildagliptin also had improvements in β‐cell function and postprandial glucose, with small changes in fasting lipids and body weight. The incidences of adverse events (AEs) (67.1, 66.3 and 64.2%) and serious AEs (2.9, 2.4 and 5.1%) were similar in patients receiving 50 mg vildagliptin, 100 mg vildagliptin or placebo respectively. The incidence of hypoglycaemic events was low but slightly higher in the group receiving vildagliptin 100 mg (3.6%) than in the group receiving vildagliptin 50 mg (1.2%) or placebo (0.6%). Conclusions: In patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with prior SU monotherapy, addition of vildagliptin (50 or 100 mg daily) to glimepiride (4 mg once daily) improves glycaemic control and is well tolerated. Addition of vildagliptin 50 mg daily to SU monotherapy may be a particularly attractive therapy in elderly patients.