z-logo
Premium
Robust improvements in fasting and prandial measures of β‐cell function with vildagliptin in drug‐naïve patients: analysis of pooled vildagliptin monotherapy database
Author(s) -
Pratley R. E.,
Schweizer A.,
Rosenstock J.,
Foley J. E.,
Banerji M. A.,
PiSunyer F. X.,
Mills D.,
Dejager S.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00835.x
Subject(s) - vildagliptin , placebo , medicine , proinsulin , insulin , endocrinology , population , type 2 diabetes , meal , diabetes mellitus , gastroenterology , alternative medicine , environmental health , pathology
Aim:  To assess the effects of 24‐week treatment with vildagliptin on measures of β‐cell function in a broad spectrum of drug‐naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods:  Data from all double‐blind, multicentre, randomized, placebo‐ or active‐controlled trials conducted in drug‐naïve patients with T2DM were pooled from all patients receiving monotherapy with vildagliptin (100 mg daily: 50 mg twice daily or 100 mg once daily, n = 1855) or placebo (n = 347). Fasting measures of β‐cell function [homeostasis model assessment of β‐cell function (HOMA‐B) and proinsulin : insulin ratio] were assessed in the overall pooled monotherapy population. Standard meal tests were performed at baseline and week 24 in a subset of patients, and effects of vildagliptin (100 mg daily, n = 227) on dynamic (meal test–derived) measures of β‐cell function [insulin secretion rate relative to glucose (ISR/G) and insulinogenic indices] were assessed relative to baseline and vs. placebo (n = 29). Results:  In the overall population, vildagliptin significantly increased HOMA‐B both relative to baseline [adjusted mean change (AMΔ) = 10.3 ± 1.5] and vs. placebo (between‐treatment difference in AMΔ = 11.5 ± 4.5, p = 0.01) and significantly decreased the proinsulin : insulin ratio relative to baseline (AMΔ = −0.05 ± 0.01) and vs. placebo (between‐treatment difference in AMΔ = −0.09 ± 0.02, p < 0.001). Relative to baseline, vildagliptin monotherapy significantly increased all meal test–derived parameters, and ISR/G (between‐treatment difference in AMΔ = 9.8 ± 2.8 pmol/min/m 2 /mM, p < 0.001) and the insulinogenic index 0–peak glucose (between‐treatment difference in AMΔ = 0.24 ± 0.05 pmol/mmol, p = 0.045) were significantly increased vs. placebo. Conclusions:  Vildagliptin monotherapy consistently produced robust improvements in both fasting and meal test–derived measures of β‐cell function across a broad spectrum of drug‐naïve patients with T2DM. All Phase III trials described (NCT 00099905, NCT 00099866, NCT 00099918, NCT 00101673, NCT 00101803 and NCT 00120536) are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here