Premium
X‐PERT: weight reduction with orlistat in obese subjects receiving a mildly or moderately reduced‐energy diet. Early response to treatment predicts weight maintenance
Author(s) -
Toplak H.,
Ziegler O.,
Keller U.,
Hamann A.,
Godin C.,
Wittert G.,
Zanella M.T.,
ZúñigaGuajardo S.,
Van Gaal L.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
diabetes, obesity and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.445
H-Index - 128
eISSN - 1463-1326
pISSN - 1462-8902
DOI - 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2005.00483.x
Subject(s) - orlistat , weight loss , reduction (mathematics) , energy expenditure , medicine , obesity , mathematics , geometry
Aim: To determine the effect of two different levels of energy deficit on weight loss in obese patients treated with orlistat. Methods: Patients (n = 430) were randomized in a 1‐year, multicentre, open‐label, parallel group study conducted at 23 hospital centres and university medical departments worldwide. Obese outpatients (body mass index 30–43 kg/m 2 ) aged 18–70 years with a body weight of ≥90 kg and a waist circumference of ≥88 cm (women) or ≥102 cm (men) were treated with orlistat 120 mg three times daily plus a diet that provided an energy deficit of either 500 or 1000 kcal/day for 1 year. Orlistat treatment was discontinued in patients who did not achieve ≥5% weight loss after assessment at 3 and 6 months. The primary outcome measure was change in body weight from baseline at week 52. Results: Reported mean difference in energy intake between the two groups (500–1000 kcal/day deficit) at weeks 24 and 52 was actually 111 and 95 kcal/day respectively. Of the 430 patients involved in the study, 295 achieved ≥5% weight loss at both 3 and 6 months. In this population, at week 52, weight loss from baseline was similar for patients randomized to either the 500 or the 1000 kcal/day deficit diet (−11.4 kg vs. −11.8 kg, respectively; p = 0.778). After 12 months of treatment with orlistat, 84% (n = 118/141) and 85% (n = 131/154) of patients in the 500 and 1000 kcal/day deficit groups, respectively, achieved ≥5% weight loss, and 50% (n = 70/141) and 53% (n = 82/154) of patients, respectively, achieved ≥10% weight loss. Patients in both the diet treatment groups showed similar significant improvements in blood pressure, lipid levels and waist circumference at week 52. Conclusions: Treatment with orlistat was associated with a clinically beneficial weight loss, irrespective of the prescribed dietary energy restriction (−500 or −1000 kcal/day). Patients who achieved ≥5% weight loss at 3 months achieved long‐term, clinically beneficial weight loss with orlistat plus either diet. Therefore, identifying patients who lose at least 5% weight after 3 months and who maintain this weight loss up to 6 months is a valuable treatment algorithm to select patients who will benefit most from orlistat treatment in combination with diet.