Premium
Hand‐assisted laparoscopic versus total laparoscopic right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial
Author(s) -
Ng L. W. C.,
Tung L. M.,
Cheung H. Y. S.,
Wong J. C. H.,
Chung C. C.,
Li M. K. W.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03028.x
Subject(s) - medicine , randomized controlled trial , colectomy , general surgery , laparoscopy , surgery , colorectal cancer , cancer
Aim Laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer is associated with definite short‐term benefits, and is increasingly practised worldwide. The limitations of a pure laparoscopic approach include a relative lack of tactile feedback and long procedural time. Hand‐assisted laparoscopic surgery was introduced in an attempt to facilitate operation by improving the tactile sensation. To date, there is no consensus as to which approach is better. Herein we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing hand‐assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) with total laparoscopic colectomy (TLC) in the management of right‐sided colonic cancer. Methods Adult patients with carcinoma of the caecum and ascending colon were recruited and randomized to undergo either HALC or TLC. Measured outcomes included operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative morbidities, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, disease recurrence and patient survival. Results Sixty patients (HALC = 30, TLC = 30) were recruited. The two groups were comparable with regard to age, gender distribution, body mass index and final histopathological staging. No difference was observed between the groups in terms of operating time, conversion rate, operative blood loss, pain score and length of hospital stay. With a median follow‐up of 27 to 33 months, no difference was observed in terms of disease recurrence, and the 5‐year survival rates remained similar (83% vs 80%, P = 0.923). Conclusion HALC is safe and feasible, but it does not show any significant benefits over TLC in terms of operating time and conversion rate. Routine use of the hand‐assisted laparoscopic technique in right hemicolectomy is therefore not recommended.