Premium
Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach
Author(s) -
Gouvas N.,
Pechlivanides G.,
Zervakis N.,
Kafousi M.,
Xynos E.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03019.x
Subject(s) - medicine , laparoscopic surgery , colorectal cancer , laparoscopy , surgery , open surgery , general surgery , cancer
Background Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vessel ligation (CVL) as performed in Erlangen offers the best long‐term outcome for colon cancer. The aim of this study was to assess specimens after laparoscopic vs open CME‐CVL macroscopically and morphometrically in patients with left and right colon cancers. Method All specimens were freshly photographed. Precise tumour morphometry and grading of the surgical plane were performed as described by pathologists in Leeds, UK. Results Thirty‐four specimens from right‐sided cancers were divided into 18 transverse colon cancers (nine laparoscopic vs nine open) and 16 caecum–ascending colon cancers (seven laparoscopic vs nine open) and 56 specimens from left‐sided cancers (33 laparoscopic vs 23 open). There was no difference between laparoscopically and open acquired left‐ and right‐sided specimens. Specimens of transverse colon displayed differences in length of central ligation to tumour (open 11.67 cm vs laparoscopic 8.72 cm, P = 0.049), length of central ligation to bowel wall (open 9.11 cm vs laparoscopic 6.5 cm, P = 0.015) and lymph node clearance (open 46.33 vs laparoscopic 39.33, P = 0.033). Conclusion Laparoscopy seems to offer specimens of similar quality after CME‐CVL surgery for colon cancer to the open approach. Issues of completeness of excision from laparoscopy are raised for tumours located in the transverse colon.