Premium
The impact of national guidelines on the waiting list for colonoscopy: a quantitative clinical audit
Author(s) -
Chivers K.,
Basnyat P.,
Taffinder N.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01871.x
Subject(s) - colonoscopy , medicine , audit , referral , colorectal cancer , population , general surgery , emergency medicine , medical emergency , family medicine , cancer , environmental health , management , economics
Objective To assess the compliance of the surveillance colonoscopy waiting list with ACPGBI/BSG guidelines for colonoscopy follow‐up and to measure the impact of adjusting referrals to be inline with the guidelines. Design and Setting This is a quantitative five‐stage clinical audit cycle involving a large patient cohort from the Kent and Medway Cancer Network, which includes seven hospitals across four NHS Hospital Trusts and an estimated population of 1.8 million. Participants 3020 patients were waiting for a surveillance colonoscopy. Their notes were reviewed and the indications for colonoscopy were compared with the ACPGBI/BSG 2002 guidelines. Interventions Those patients whose referral to the surveillance colonoscopy waiting list was not found to be compliant were adjusted to be inline with the guidelines. Main outcome measures The impact of adjusting the surveillance colonoscopy waiting list on the diagnostic colonoscopy service was assessed by measuring the average waiting times for a colonoscopy before and after the intervention. Results Around 22% ( n = 664) of surveillance colonoscopy referrals were inline with the guidelines, 51% ( n = 1540) could be cancelled from the list and 27% ( n = 816) could be given a new date. Implementing these recommendations reduced the average wait for a diagnostic colonoscopy from 76.8 to 56.0 days ( P = 0.0022). Conclusion Following guidelines for surveillance colonoscopy can reduce waiting times for diagnostic colonoscopy. This allows a faster patient journey for diagnostic colonoscopy and a uniform plan for duration and frequency of surveillance colonoscopy. However, this action promoted serious debate on the social, moral and ethical issues.