Premium
Endoscopic transanal resection of rectal tumours using a urological resectoscope – still has a role in selected patients
Author(s) -
Beattie G. C.,
Paul I.,
Calvert C. H.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00668.x
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , villous adenoma , rectum , microsurgery , fulguration , rectal polyp
Transanal resection of rectal villous adenomas or adenocarcinomas can be carried out using various modalities such as operative excision, fulguration, laser coagulation or cryotherapy. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is currently not widely available. Transanal resection can provide effective palliation for locally advanced rectal tumours in patients unfit for abdomino‐perineal excision of rectum. A urological resectoscope can be safely and repeatedly used to resect advanced primary or locally recurrent rectal rumours by colorectal surgeons with urological expertise. This study reports our experience of treating rectal lesions with endoscopic transanal resection (ETAR) using the urological resectoscope. Methods Patients were identified from one surgeons' prospectively collected operating data. Charts were retrieved and reviewed. Results Over a 13‐year period a total of 43 ETAR procedures were carried out in 20 patients (11 males; mean age 74 years; range 54–92 years) using the urological resectoscope. Twelve (60%) patients had a single resection; 8 (40%) patients required more than one resection; the mean number of procedures per patient was 2.2 (range1–8). The median interval between resections for recurrent disease (excluding planned repeat resections) was 340 days (range 168–2337 days). Histopathology revealed rectal adenoma (with varying degrees of dysplasia) in 11 (55%) patients and adenocarcinoma in 9 (45%). The majority (30; 70%) of resections were carried out in patients with benign disease, with 13 (30%) in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Mean operating time per resection was 25 min. Thirteen (30%) resections were carried out under spinal anaesthetic. There was no procedure related mortality. There were no cases of haemorrhage, rectal perforation, ‘TUR syndrome’ or pelvic sepsis. No patients with benign disease subsequently developed an invasive carcinoma. Conclusions Accepting that this technique provides limited histopathological information regarding extent of resection and tumour clearance, our experience demonstrates that ETAR of rectal tumours using the urological resectoscope can provide a minimally invasive, effective and safe means of treating and palliating patients with benign and malignant rectal disease. There remains a place for this technique in selected patients.